InsightsIQ Case Study

From Data Silos to Strategic Insight

How NFID Unlocked 4 Years of Untapped Survey Intelligence

National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (NFID)

NFID knew their webinars were valuable. They just couldn't prove it — or improve it.

51

Webinars

Analyzed

3,001

Survey

Responses

4 yrs

Data

2022–2025

7 days

Delivery

Turnaround

The Challenge

The National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (NFID) had been quietly building something impressive: a robust continuing education program spanning 51 webinars and 3,001 survey responses collected between 2022 and 2025. But the data sat largely unused.

Their Professional Education team — small, resource-constrained, and wearing multiple hats — faced a problem that's more common than most organizations admit: they had years of attendee feedback with no systematic way to compare it, no framework to identify trends, and critically, no clear sense of what questions to even ask of the data.

The goal wasn't just to run a report. It was to figure out whether any meaningful insight existed in the first place.

"They had years of attendee feedback with no systematic way to compare it, no framework to identify trends, and no clear sense of what questions to even ask of the data."

The Approach

Within one week of receiving the raw survey data, a full analysis was delivered — covering all 51 webinars across both live (27) and on-demand (24) formats. Rather than simply summarizing responses, the analysis was structured around five strategic questions that a professional education program actually needs to answer:

  • Are attendees satisfied with content quality?
  • Are attendees satisfied with speaker quality?
  • Does this education change how clinicians practice?
  • What topics do attendees want more of?
  • Does satisfaction or impact vary by profession?

Each question was answered with data, and where the data had limitations or gaps, those were documented too — along with specific recommendations for how to collect better data going forward.

What the Data Revealed

Content and speakers earn strong marks.

Satisfaction is consistently high across all content quality metrics. Speaker performance is a particular strength: 95% of responses rate speakers as Excellent or Very Good on both knowledge and teaching effectiveness. No speaker emerged as a clear area for improvement.

But education isn't yet moving the needle on practice change.

This was the most important finding — and the most actionable. Attendees are satisfied, but few report expecting the education to change patient outcomes. For a medical education organization, this gap between satisfaction and impact is significant. It suggests the program may be optimized for a good experience without yet being optimized for clinical behavior change.

Impact isn't uniform across professions.

While satisfaction is high across the board, the data shows that perceived impact varies by professional role — a signal that content framing or format may need to shift depending on who's in the audience.

The webinar leaderboard points to a clear differentiator.

Most webinars cluster in a performance band of 79–89 on composite scoring. What separates the top performers? Speaker quality. This gives the team a concrete, evidence-based lever to pull when curating future programming.

Topic demand is broad, with two clear signals.

Travel vaccines and COVID-19 are the most explicitly requested subjects. Most other feedback is general — which itself is a data point worth acting on by building more specific topic-selection mechanisms into future surveys.

What Was Delivered

Webinar performance leaderboard

Benchmarking all 51 programs on composite satisfaction and impact scores, enabling direct comparison across formats and topics.

Profession-level breakdowns

Showing exactly where impact perception diverges by professional role — physician, nurse, pharmacist, and others.

Future survey design recommendations

Specific questions and data points to capture going forward that will make the next analysis even more powerful.

Honest notes about data limitations

Including where the current dataset constrained conclusions and why — so the team knows exactly what to measure next.

"A small team with limited resources walked away with four years of clarity in under a week."

The Result

A small team with limited resources walked away with four years of clarity in under a week. They now know what's working, where the gap between satisfaction and impact lies, and exactly what to measure next to close it. More importantly, they have a repeatable framework — not just a one-time report.

Why It Mattered

Professional education programs often measure what's easy to measure: did people show up, did they enjoy it. NFID now has the foundation to measure what actually matters: does it change how clinicians care for patients?

That's a harder question. But it's the right one.

Does your organization have untapped event data?

We'll tell you what's in it — and what it means — within a week.

Book a Call

About EventEdIQ

EventEdIQ builds simple, affordable tools for event and association teams. InsightsIQ helps associations make sense of data they've been collecting for years — surfacing patterns, answering strategic questions, and identifying opportunities hidden in data you already own.