ContentIQ
Smarter Content Planning, End to End
From helping speakers write better proposals to tracking performance over time. ContentIQ gives your team the tools to build a stronger program with less manual work.
Proposal Assistant
Help speakers craft stronger, more relevant submissions.
Community Voting
Hear from your audience at any stage of selection.
AI Scoring Engine
Review hundreds of proposals in minutes.
Bad Proposals Waste Everyone's Time.
Help speakers submit stronger proposals.
Your review committee shouldn't have to spend hours evaluating proposals that never stood a chance. Yet without enough guidance upfront, speakers submit content that misses the mark, and your team inherits the cleanup.
The Proposal Assistant walks speakers through your requirements in real time. AI feedback flags issues before submission — vague abstracts, missing objectives, topics outside your priorities. Speakers get a stronger proposal; your committee gets submissions worth reviewing.
- Branded microsite with your event's requirements
- AI feedback on clarity and relevance before submission
- Topic suggestions based on your CFP priorities
Sound familiar?
Speakers miss the mark
They submit what they want to present, not what your audience needs. Topics overlap, content levels mismatch, strategic priorities get ignored.
Quality varies wildly
First-time speakers submit rough drafts. Experienced speakers phone it in. Without guidance, fair comparison is nearly impossible.
Weeks of back-and-forth
Staff emails speakers asking for more detail, clearer objectives, updated bios. The manual cleanup takes weeks and delays your whole timeline.
You're Guessing What Attendees Want.
Let your audience help shape the program.
Committees select sessions based on gut feel, past experience and whoever argues loudest in the review meeting. But how often do you ask your audience which of the actual proposed sessions they'd want to attend?
Community Voting sends each participant a sample of proposals to rate, whenever their input will help most — while submissions are still coming in, once the CFP closes or as your committee finalizes the program. In about five minutes, they tell you what they'd actually attend, so your committee has data, not just opinions.
- Each attendee rates 20 random proposals
- Simple 1-5 interest scale with aggregate rankings
- Community scores feed into final proposal rankings
- Filter results by track, export to CSV
Sound familiar?
Programming in the dark
Your committee picks 80 sessions from 400 submissions without data on what attendees actually want — and discovers it guessed wrong when evaluations come back six months later.
Popular demand never enters the room
Committees favor topics they personally find interesting. New topics get dismissed as 'unproven.' What your membership wants never enters the conversation.
Hundreds of Proposals. Hours of Reviewing. There's a Better Way.
Faster reviews, consistent scoring and insights beyond what manual reviews can deliver.
Reviewing hundreds of proposals is a massive undertaking. Every submission deserves a thorough evaluation, but giving each one that attention takes considerable time and resources. Add inconsistent scoring, reviewer fatigue and the difficulty of identifying patterns across hundreds of submissions, and even a well-organized review process can stretch into days or weeks.
The AI Scoring Engine takes on the heavy lifting, evaluating every proposal against your criteria in minutes. Use it as a first pass to identify weaker submissions and narrow the pool before committee review, or as a second set of eyes alongside your reviewers. It flags potential duplicates, content risks and scoring patterns across hundreds of submissions, with a criterion-by-criterion rationale for every score. Your committee gets a more complete picture, spends less time on repetitive reviews and retains control over the final decisions.
- Customizable scoring rubric and weights
- Criterion-by-criterion rationale for every score
- AI-generated content risk detection
- Send scored proposals directly to Schedule Optimizer
Sound familiar?
40+ hours of reviews
Committees spend 40+ hours on proposals that could be triaged in minutes. Every hour spent on obvious rejects is an hour not spent on real decisions.
A 4 to one reviewer is a 7 to another
Different reviewers interpret criteria differently. Calibration meetings help but don't solve the problem.
By proposal #200, everyone is skimming
Quality suffers when people are asked to do repetitive evaluation at scale — and later proposals get less attention than early ones.
How event planners use ContentIQ
Improve the entire submission-to-selection process
Guide speakers toward stronger proposals, evaluate submissions consistently and incorporate audience preferences before finalizing your program. Use the capabilities together or wherever they fit your existing process.
Give reviewers a head start
Use AI scoring to evaluate the full submission pool, identify proposals that may not meet your criteria and help committees focus their time on submissions requiring closer consideration.
Add another perspective to committee decisions
Compare AI evaluations with human reviewer scores to identify disagreements, potential duplicates and submissions worth discussing further.
Bring your audience into programming decisions
Gather feedback on actual proposed sessions, not just broad topic preferences, and use that insight to inform selections and understand what your audience is most interested in attending.
Reduce unconscious bias
Apply the same scoring criteria to every proposal, reducing the influence of individual reviewer preferences and helping surface strong submissions that might otherwise be overlooked.
Keep the tools you already use.
ContentIQ integrates with Cadmium, PheedLoop, Sessionize, and more — no migration, no rip-and-replace.
ContentIQ
Proposal tools, Community Voting & AI Scoring Engine.
You are hereReady to plan smarter content?
See what ContentIQ can do with your data. Schedule a call and we'll walk through it.
Talk to Us